Responding to recent news
I see the user shared a sentence in Chinese about West Ham United's official statement on Paqueta's dropped betting charges. It seems they might want a summary or discussion on this news. I should respond, acknowledging their message, and ask if they need more context about the timeline and FA investigation into Paqueta's alleged betting-related issues. However, I need to be careful since my knowledge cuts off in October 2024, so I can’t confirm any updates beyond that.Clarifying response options
I need to consider that we don’t have real-time browsing by default, but I can ask if the user wants verification. It seems the main focus should be on staying concise and acknowledging the situation. Since the user didn't ask a specific question, I should inquire if they’d like context about Paqueta's case, including potential impacts and next steps. I could frame it as good news for Paqueta and West Ham, while also mentioning any pending hearings. It’s important to avoid spreading misinformation!
如果消息属实，这是对帕奎塔和西汉姆的重大利好。若指控已正式撤销，则：
- 出场与禁赛风险：不再面临纪律听证与潜在停赛，可正常出场（以联赛与协会流程为准）。 
- 转会与合同：不确定性消除，有利于潜在转会/续约谈判与估值回升。
- 声誉与舆论：短期仍有讨论余波，俱乐部“无评论”多为降温处理。
需要我帮你：
- 核验权威来源并给出原公告与主流媒体链接；或
- 整理一份简明时间线与后续影响要点（联赛、国家队、转会）？ 